Save money now: 27 ways to lower your utility bills
In the current economic climate, its been a bit rough for those that want to go green on a budget. Not everyone can...
Read the rest of this articleIn the current economic climate, its been a bit rough for those that want to go green on a budget. Not everyone can...
Read the rest of this article
Incentives to switch from a car that gets 14 miles per gallon to one with a 15 mpg rating aren’t exactly going to save the planet.
That’s an extreme example of the problem with the latest cash for clunkers bill currently heading through congress.
The program has the right idea: Giving gas guzzler owners incentives to purchase new, clean, efficient cars.
It would give $3,500 for someone willing to make the switch from a car with 18 mpg to a car with more than 22 mpg. A $4,500 reward would go to car owners who make a jump of 10 mpg or more.
But SUVs and light trucks only have to slide from 16 to 18 mpg to above that mark for the $3,500 check. Big trucks only need to move from 14 to 15 mpg.
Rueters reported an average car trade in at the $3,500 level would save 1 gallon per 100 miles, compared to 0.5 per 100 miles for a truck.
Unfortunately, the legislation seems to be geared more toward keeping dying American automakers viable than getting frivolous SUVs off the road.
The program would better serve its purpose without an SUV-truck clause. Instead, it should discourage people from purchasing unnecessarily large vehicles, but should also attempt to push public transit.
In effect, truck owners could qualify for this incentive program while purchasing a new vehicle that doesn’t even meet the government’s average fuel economy standards.
Michigan Congressman John Dingell told the Environment Report that the point is improving efficiency, not reaching a certain level.
“What they aught to ask is, ‘What is this going to mean in terms of increased fuel efficiency and reduced CO2 emissions.’ The result would be substantial,” he said.
The American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy disagrees.
“Federal incentives should promote vehicles with above-average fuel economy, at a minimum, so that American consumers are better prepared for the higher gasoline prices that are likely to return once the current recession ends,” ACEEE Executive Director Steven Nadel said.
Why Tainted Green? Literally, green is only a color. But in typical human fashion we've pumped a cacophony of additional meanings and symbolism into the word. Green has become a marketing tool used by companies with impunity to wrap their products in a balmy haze of "ethical" and "conscientious" approval.
That's where Tainted Green steps in. We are seekers of truth, and we support the fundamental drivers behind the green movement. Ideas like permaculture, renewable energy, and recycling make sense, but companies that express support for green without a wholesome process behind it have tainted the meaning of green. And so, our focus is to create green content that pushes the ideology forward while pointing out which parts look like this year's marketing baggage. Welcome to Tainted Green, where we focus on unearthing the truth about green.
