Uneven electric car rebates give Nissan Leaf edge over Volt

Uneven electric car rebates give Nissan Leaf edge over Volt Electric car manufactures, like it or not, depend heavily on political policies and funding to grow not only their electric vehicles, but also the electric car revolution. The relative newness of the industry combined with the already heavily established gasoline-powered car make it difficult for an inexpensive transition to emission-free transportation. Thus, the need for big bucks from Uncle Sam.

For cars like the Chevy Volt, Toyota Prius and Nissan Leaf, government funding, in the initial adoption of the electric and hybrid vehicle market, make expensive alternatives more affordable and more of a reality.

As the Nissan Leaf and Chevy Volt get ready to release their electric vehicles, a little extra assistance goes a long way in giving one manufacturer the edge over the other.

For the consumer, its pretty easy to pick out the obvious differences between the Chevy Volt and the Nissan Leaf: the Chevy Volt gets a 40 mile electric range and once the battery is exhausted, the gas tank cuts in while the Nissan Leaf gets about a 90 mile electric range, but cannot go beyond that as it does not utilize a gas engine at all.

As Nissan holds firmly to, 90% of Americans use less than 100 miles in a single day. Nissan hopes that will sway consumers away from what has been coined as “range anxiety” by the Chevy Volt line director, Tony Posawatz.

That is the hope, but who knows the reality once the electric cars hit the market.

One very obvious reality facing both the Chevy Volt and the Nissan Leaf is government funding. Both cars, when initially purchased, reward buyers with a $7,500 tax rebate.

The rebate will bring the the Chevy Volt down from $41,000 to $33,500 and the Nissan Leaf from $32,780 to $25,280.

The kicker in the deal is that state governments, like in Tennessee and California, are giving specific rebates to the Nissan Leaf and not the Chevy Volt.

In California, zero-emissions vehicles like the Nissan Leaf receive up to $5,000 in rebates. Because the Volt doesn’t fit in the zero-emissions category, it does not qualify for the rebate.

Just recently announced, Tennessee is offering $2,500 in rebates for the first 1,000 Leaf buyers from a state fund known as the petroleum violation escrow account (money collected from the oil companies by the federal government that is given to the state).

Sure, consumers may see a competitive advantage in the gas tank of the Chevy Volt, but it doesn’t seem like the government is seeing the same advantage.

In fact, Tennessee is working on a plan to create an EV charging network between 3 major cities by 2013 that would allow Nissan Leaf owners to extend the 100 miles on their battery range and California has several policies in place that only benefit the Nissan Leaf.

There is still time, but the Volt is going to need to get more government buy in to be competitive.

Comments

So we Give Nissan all this money while the Japanese put huge tariffs on our cars... how stupid is that!   Why doesn't our media pulbish what goes on in Japan? They are our car industries major competitor yet we never compare how they treat GM and FORD.   Our media does not have enough competition. I would like to see Japanese media putting American media out of business... then maybe we will see some fair press. We should be publishing what a CHEVY VOLT costs in other major markets.

Title is wrong. It should say Pure Electric gets more rebate back than Plug in Hybrids.

They are not the same technology.  They don't emit the same amount of pollution from the tailpipe.

Pure electric emits 0,  Plug in Hybrids very little.  The government prefers 0.

It's not a Japan/US issue as Anonymous commented.  If GM makes a Pure Electric vehicle they will get the same rebate. GM should also make a pure electric vehicle.  Just remove the gasoline engine, add more batteries, let the buyers have a better selection.

Ninety nine percent of americans (not 90%) drive less than 100 miles per day.  I drive 76 miles and my wife drives 28 miles, but we carpool most of the time.  A 100 mile range of pure electric would work for us better than Gasoline/Electric hybrid.

 

Agreed. There is a big difference between a hybrid and EV - not in the political realm either. EVs are the start to weening ourselves off our Petrol addiction - the hybrid is purely a transistional option. There are also many non-hybrid small cars that compare to hypbrids in gas efficiency, so what is the point of spending more money on an automobile that still depends on Petrol, but costs more than a comparable small car?

Yes until that 90 mile range is dramatically reduced if you happen to use air conditioning or a heater. I would pay just to see the look on your face when you are stranded roadside. The Volt is a real car you could use all the time; the Leaf is a golf cart. The Leaf was an ill conceived, knee jerk reaction to the Volt, it has zero battery temperature control and was hastily brought to market, it will fail miserably as extended range cars become the norm. The rebate penalty is about what I expect of narrow minded, short sighted government morons.

It has nothing to do with xenophobia; it has to do with keeping your neighbors employed rather than bolstering the economies of other countries; ever hear of family first? German manufacturers wouldn’t dare build a car in a non union shop in their own country, but have no problem doing it here. And guess what, every US plant in Europe is a union shop, imagine that.

Yeah. The same 'government morons' that saved GM.

that is a great deal!

I agree , we know that GM is a leader and we know that Chevy Volt is a great car  but other than that, the media in our country is not coming up with enough coverage, all we get to read and watch are some reviews and videos of the new model and that's it. Don't we have the right to know what's going on in other countries as well? We definitely feel aloof when the media which is the only source of information is not coming up with sufficient information, how well-informed are we about the business of other countries?