Save money now: 27 ways to lower your utility bills
In the current economic climate, its been a bit rough for those that want to go green on a budget. Not everyone can...
Read the rest of this articleIn the current economic climate, its been a bit rough for those that want to go green on a budget. Not everyone can...
Read the rest of this article
Apparently Michael Pollan’s seven-word philosophy on eating – “Eat food, not too much, mostly plants” – is falling on millions of deaf ears.
The author of The Omnivore’s Dilemma and In Defense of Food says the U.S. spends $500 to $750 billion on health care just because of the way we eat. Things like high fructose corn syrup are finding their way into more and more foods, which is cheap and profitable for the processed food industry, terrible for consumers and a boon for the health care industry, he says.
“The health care industry profits mightily from the sickness of the population,” he said. “You know, the food industry is producing lots of patients for the healthcare industry. It’s a very convenient relationship.”
But there is hope, Pollan argues in an interview with Democracy Now’s Amy Goodman. The proposed health care plans currently in congress are attempting to insure everyone is on an equal footing. That means healthy folks as well as people who are expensive to care for like those with Type 2 diabetes won’t be turned away by insurance providers.
A big factor of getting Type 2 diabetes is diet. If insurance companies are forced to keep diabetics under the umbrella, they will have an incentive to keep people healthy. Because, of course, a healthy diabetic requires much less expensive care. With this incentive, the health care industry and the food industry would be at odds, which can only benefit the American public. Then, instead of trying to sneak around Pollan’s food rules, which he lays out in the new book Food Rules: An Eater’s Manual, the health care industry might actually embrace a new way of thinking about diet.
Now if there was only a way to pit the American people against the processed food industry directly, which would be better for us, animals and the world.
Why Tainted Green? Literally, green is only a color. But in typical human fashion we've pumped a cacophony of additional meanings and symbolism into the word. Green has become a marketing tool used by companies with impunity to wrap their products in a balmy haze of "ethical" and "conscientious" approval.
That's where Tainted Green steps in. We are seekers of truth, and we support the fundamental drivers behind the green movement. Ideas like permaculture, renewable energy, and recycling make sense, but companies that express support for green without a wholesome process behind it have tainted the meaning of green. And so, our focus is to create green content that pushes the ideology forward while pointing out which parts look like this year's marketing baggage. Welcome to Tainted Green, where we focus on unearthing the truth about green.
