Save money now: 27 ways to lower your utility bills
In the current economic climate, its been a bit rough for those that want to go green on a budget. Not everyone can...
Read the rest of this articleIn the current economic climate, its been a bit rough for those that want to go green on a budget. Not everyone can...
Read the rest of this article
The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) celebrated its 50th Anniversary earlier this month, and identified alternative energy as one of the main challenges it faces today. Secretary-General Abdalla El-Badri spoke in reference to government policies that favor alternative sources of energy while taxing fossil fuels.
Worldwide last year, governments gave about $45 billion in support of renewable energy from sources such as wind, solar power and biofuels, according to London-based research group Bloomberg New England Finance. In contrast, the International Energy Agency (IEA) reports that governments gave more than $550 billion to subsidize fossil fuels in 2008. That's more than 12 times the amount given to renewable energy.
Leading members of OPEC promote green energy initiatives within their own borders. Earlier this year, Saudi Arabia announced its intention to build solar-powered desalination plants, and El-Badria stated that oil's finite nature means that OPEC members will need to seek out alternative sources of power for the future. Besides power, OPEC should also examine the global health and environmental costs of oil. In June, Saudi Arabia blocked a request from island nations seeking information on global warming. Barbados had asked the United Nations to produce a study exploring what effects a 2.7 degree F increase would have on the island nations, stating fears that rising sea levels may drown their lands. Saudi Arabia objected on the grounds that the UN doesn’t have the ability to carry out such an extensive study.
OPEC is comprised of 12 nations, including founding members Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabic and Venezuela. Last month it produced more than one third of global oil supplies and its members control 80 percent of the world's known oil reserves.
Why Tainted Green? Literally, green is only a color. But in typical human fashion we've pumped a cacophony of additional meanings and symbolism into the word. Green has become a marketing tool used by companies with impunity to wrap their products in a balmy haze of "ethical" and "conscientious" approval.
That's where Tainted Green steps in. We are seekers of truth, and we support the fundamental drivers behind the green movement. Ideas like permaculture, renewable energy, and recycling make sense, but companies that express support for green without a wholesome process behind it have tainted the meaning of green. And so, our focus is to create green content that pushes the ideology forward while pointing out which parts look like this year's marketing baggage. Welcome to Tainted Green, where we focus on unearthing the truth about green.

Comments
I think the numbers sum it all up well- sure renewables have a huge variety of impressive impacts but what about the subsidies...
Renewable subsidies totalled $45 billion while fossil fuels received $550 billion the year before. That doesnt even begin to compare. Add in the infrastructure already in place for fossil fuels and its an uphill and unfair battle for renewables that I hate seeing get clouded by people misunderstanding the subsidies.