Save money now: 27 ways to lower your utility bills
In the current economic climate, its been a bit rough for those that want to go green on a budget. Not everyone can...
Read the rest of this articleIn the current economic climate, its been a bit rough for those that want to go green on a budget. Not everyone can...
Read the rest of this article
Google and Nokia are both vying for dominance in the mobile operating system world and while both of them have plans in motion to accomplish that goal, they’ve both paused a moment to sign an energy letter to Obama. That letter spells out several specific suggestions for the President which essentially make it easier for consumers and businesses to monitor their energy usage.
The letter describes how blind most energy consumers currently are because they have no idea how individual devices are affecting their bill every month. The only thing they can easily discern is the dollar amount due.
Google gave a shout out to the letter on its blog and indicated that the group of companies will continue to offer ideas on how the government can make energy usage easier in the home and in businesses. Energy “. . . savings could be substantial when added up: if all U.S. households saved 15% on their energy use by 2020, for example, the greenhouse gas savings would be equivalent to taking 35 million cars off the road and would save consumers $46 billion on their energy bills, or $360 per customer each year,” according to the letter.
That statistic will vary widely depending on the scale of the home or business. A one bedroom apartment with an electric bill of $60 per month would probably see a minimal difference even with monitoring installed. That scenario already has built in energy efficiencies because of its close proximity to neighbors and centralized community resource planning.
Essentially the letter urges Obama to act as a facilitator of information between companies and to establish standards that communicate to energy consumers how much energy a device will require. Admittedly, sending a letter to Obama on efficient energy usage generates a plenty of positive buzz by itself, so that’s just icing on the cake.
Why Tainted Green? Literally, green is only a color. But in typical human fashion we've pumped a cacophony of additional meanings and symbolism into the word. Green has become a marketing tool used by companies with impunity to wrap their products in a balmy haze of "ethical" and "conscientious" approval.
That's where Tainted Green steps in. We are seekers of truth, and we support the fundamental drivers behind the green movement. Ideas like permaculture, renewable energy, and recycling make sense, but companies that express support for green without a wholesome process behind it have tainted the meaning of green. And so, our focus is to create green content that pushes the ideology forward while pointing out which parts look like this year's marketing baggage. Welcome to Tainted Green, where we focus on unearthing the truth about green.
