Save money now: 27 ways to lower your utility bills
In the current economic climate, its been a bit rough for those that want to go green on a budget. Not everyone can...
Read the rest of this articleIn the current economic climate, its been a bit rough for those that want to go green on a budget. Not everyone can...
Read the rest of this article
A scorching study of more than 525 chickens by Consumer Reports found the bacteria salmonella and campylobacter in 83 percent of the birds.
That’s a huge increase from a 2003 study, and is an obvious cause for concern. Most of us are already familiar with salmonella, but campylobacter is still obscure, although this bacteria is popping up in more chickens than ever, according to the study. The study included chickens from four leading brands: Foster Farms, Perdue, Pilgrim’s Pride and Tyson.
The Department of Agriculture, which already tests chickens for salmonella, doesn’t have any standards for testing or controlling campylobacter. The government should take this study to heart, and put in place better measures to protect consumers from campylobacter.
But what exactly are the dangers of these bacteria? Here’s what the study says on that topic: “Both salmonella and campylobacter can cause intestinal distress, and campylobacter can also lead to meningitis, arthritis, and Guillain-Barré syndrome, a neurological disorder.” Campylobacter and salmonella sickened more than 3.4 million Americans and killed more than 700 since 1999, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
To make matters worse, most of the contaminated chickens were resistant to some antibiotics. Antibiotics are given to chickens to both speed their growth and to stave off sickness rather than paying for expensive veterinarian care. Unfortunately, chickens can pass some of that resistance on to humans, making us harder to treat with antibiotics.
The one chicken producer in the study with hardly any dangerous bacteria was Ranger, a brand sold in the Northwest. Even without using antibiotics, Ranger only had two birds out of 10 with campylobacter, and none had salmonella.
For more on the study and ways to keep salmonella and campylobacter out of your kitchen and system, go to the Consumer Reports site.
Why Tainted Green? Literally, green is only a color. But in typical human fashion we've pumped a cacophony of additional meanings and symbolism into the word. Green has become a marketing tool used by companies with impunity to wrap their products in a balmy haze of "ethical" and "conscientious" approval.
That's where Tainted Green steps in. We are seekers of truth, and we support the fundamental drivers behind the green movement. Ideas like permaculture, renewable energy, and recycling make sense, but companies that express support for green without a wholesome process behind it have tainted the meaning of green. And so, our focus is to create green content that pushes the ideology forward while pointing out which parts look like this year's marketing baggage. Welcome to Tainted Green, where we focus on unearthing the truth about green.

Comments
Please remember that Consumer Reports is trying to sell subscriptions. They or other "news" organizations bring this, or a similar study out every other year or so. Everyone with a half a brain knows that you need to fully cook chicken and ground beef before eating. All pathogens will be destroyed at that time.
The Consumer's Report article had several glaring errors in it. One, was that as few as 15 salmonella per gram can cause illness. This has been documented only once: with salmonella contamination of chocolate. The 15 per gram survived because of the protection of the cocoa butter.
The chicken survey has been done for years. Why? Because it's a ratings and subscription booster. Time to move on.
that was big problem of bacteria .... consumer r selling wethere they r right qualtiy or not... but have no effect to people ill... ...this a big issus