Save money now: 27 ways to lower your utility bills
In the current economic climate, its been a bit rough for those that want to go green on a budget. Not everyone can...
Read the rest of this articleIn the current economic climate, its been a bit rough for those that want to go green on a budget. Not everyone can...
Read the rest of this article
A wave of California lawmakers flushed out an $11 billion fix to the state’s massive water conundrum. The problem? While the majority of people live in the deserts of Southern California, most of the water comes from the north.
To solve it, Gov. Terminator is proposing new dams so the Golden State can save up water for dry times. The measure will be up for a vote next November.
But as water expert Peter Gleick pointed out to the Environment Report, the idea fails to make water users accountable for their long showers and untamed irrigation.
“We will never ultimately, sustainably manage our water resources if we don’t know who is using how much water to do what,” he said. “And we don’t, with any degree of accuracy. And that’s still not addressed in this bill.”
Southern California – like the rest of southwestern United States – isn’t suitable for green grass and water slides. Any viable solution to the growing water crisis must include conservation measures. Diverting water from other parts of the country will only divert the problem temporarily.
Schwarzenegger’s solution seems to cater to the majority of Californians, located around Los Angeles and San Diego. “For decades, Californians have been fighting about water,” Schwarzenegger told the Associated Press. “I’ve heard the pleas of the people here from this valley, I have heard the pleas of the people of the state of California, and I think the legislators have heard those pleas as well. So I am here to tell all of you help is on the way.”
But water policy can’t just cater to pleas. Of course Californians want an easy fix, but hopefully come next November they’ll realize why other states – and even California – are taking down dams to protect wildlife.
So don’t drink up California, demand some accountability on water use and vote down this $11 billion band-aid.
Why Tainted Green? Literally, green is only a color. But in typical human fashion we've pumped a cacophony of additional meanings and symbolism into the word. Green has become a marketing tool used by companies with impunity to wrap their products in a balmy haze of "ethical" and "conscientious" approval.
That's where Tainted Green steps in. We are seekers of truth, and we support the fundamental drivers behind the green movement. Ideas like permaculture, renewable energy, and recycling make sense, but companies that express support for green without a wholesome process behind it have tainted the meaning of green. And so, our focus is to create green content that pushes the ideology forward while pointing out which parts look like this year's marketing baggage. Welcome to Tainted Green, where we focus on unearthing the truth about green.
