Save money now: 27 ways to lower your utility bills
In the current economic climate, its been a bit rough for those that want to go green on a budget. Not everyone can...
Read the rest of this articleIn the current economic climate, its been a bit rough for those that want to go green on a budget. Not everyone can...
Read the rest of this article
It is hard to deny that there are certain unflappable truths about the gDiaper that give it a competitive edge in the green diaper market. Mainly it offers the convenience of tossing a diaper in the toilet without having to deal with the stink. Well, there may be more of a stink than one would originally think, especially when it comes to the environment.
A recent study by the city of Vancouver looked into the impact that the flushable gDiaper had on sewage systems, water, and the environment. The results of the green diaper, although maybe on a micro scale, are no doubt both disgusting and disturbing.
The study focused primarily on the flushability of the product. Anyone who has bought a gDiaper most likely knows that the gDiaper can also be composted or thrown away. But because the gDiaper differentiates itself through its flushability claim, it is important to understand exactly what happens once the toilet lever is pressed.
The diaper's environmental impact can be understood in two parts: through the rag material and the residue left behind.
First, the rag material from the gDiaper's disposable pad swells up to about the size of a soccer ball (as this is what any absorbent diaper is supposed to do), and it ultimately creates a build up of material waste at the pump stations and the collection stations. The built-up diapers then trap water and other solids in these areas which not only adds extra maintenance work to be removed, but also makes it increasingly difficult on the fluidized bed furnace.
The fluidized bed furnace is intended to "convert biomass waste products into a combustible gas." Essentially the extra water and solids from the build-ups decrease efficiency and increase the amount of energy needed to convert the solids into a gas.
The result, according to the study is that "more diesel fuel would be consumed due to the higher water content of the sludge. Ultimately, more carbon dioxide would be discharged to the atmosphere, and more ash would be created for disposal."
Second, and less visible, is the impact that the left over residue from the green diaper had on the waste water. The gDiaper uses a cellulose fluff material in the liner that takes much longer than a few days in the sewage system to decompose.
During its time in the system, the groupings of cellulose particles interfered with the UV disinfection system by absorbing the UV wavelengths intended to disrupt and destroy the pathogens created mostly by human waste. The result was that the water that was then discharged into the river had a greater number of pathogens.
Simply put, the disinfection system didn't work nearly as well when the water was contaminated with the cellulose from the diaper.
It certainly is not an appealing thought to think of where those dirty, flushable, supposedly green diapers head off to once flushed down the drain, but it should certainly not be an afterthought.
A lot more is happening than a fun, convenient swirl down the toilet.
Why Tainted Green? Literally, green is only a color. But in typical human fashion we've pumped a cacophony of additional meanings and symbolism into the word. Green has become a marketing tool used by companies with impunity to wrap their products in a balmy haze of "ethical" and "conscientious" approval.
That's where Tainted Green steps in. We are seekers of truth, and we support the fundamental drivers behind the green movement. Ideas like permaculture, renewable energy, and recycling make sense, but companies that express support for green without a wholesome process behind it have tainted the meaning of green. And so, our focus is to create green content that pushes the ideology forward while pointing out which parts look like this year's marketing baggage. Welcome to Tainted Green, where we focus on unearthing the truth about green.

Comments
Always back to REDUCE, RE-USE AND RECYCLE. Easiest way to reduce? Reusable diapers are too easy to use and too often overlooked as a solution.
I assume this is the study you're talking about? Would be nice to cite so that people could view the source if they choose. Good article - thanks! http://www.cityofvancouver.us/upload/images/PublicWorks/Official_City%20...
Thanks for the callout on the citation. For future reference, the citations will appear in the article as hyperlinks. Glad you enjoyed the article.
Our society is always looking for something easier, when easy is often not the best answer. I have used g dipes as well as cloth and far prefer the convenience (YES! CONVENIENCE!) and customization that cloth provides.